Immanuel Kant Essays

Immanuel Kant Essays Immanuel Kant Essay Immanuel Kant Essay Essay Topic: Immanuel Kant The followers is taken from Immanuel Kant’s The Metaphysics of Morals ( Part II. The Science of Right ) . translated by W. Hastie with emendations and paragraph Numberss added by Jeremy Anderson. The complete text is available free online here. In this extract. Kant first explains what offense is and the different kinds of offenses ( paragraph 1 ) . which is non really of import for our intents. He so presents his position that penalty is justified by the criminal’s holding committed a offense ( par. 2 ) .This is to be contrasted with other theories of penalty such as the Utilitarian theory. harmonizing to which penalty is justified by the good it brings to society. Kant rejects the Utilitarian theory for two grounds. First. he believes it treats felons as mere means to others’ good ; Kant’s Categorical Imperative forbids this. Second. the Utilitarian theory could. perchance. warrant penalizing an guiltless individual because of the good it might convey to society. To Kant. this kind of unfairness is perfectly unbearable.Having explained why we punish people Kant goes on to discourse how and how much to penalize felons ( par. 3-8 ) . Here he asserts that the injury done to the felon should be the injury the felon did to others. both in sum and in sort ( in category we are naming this the Equal Punishment version of the lex talionis ) . The remainder of the piece largely explains what he means by this. with peculiar accent on the demand for the decease punishment. In paragraphs 8 and 10 Kant considers some interesting exclusions to the regulation that liquidators must be executed.Okay. so Kant believed that penalty should ever be in response to a offense – penalizing person to protect society or to discourage others is immoral. Kant goes on to state that it is besides immoral for a individual to perpetrate a offense. and non be punished. In other words. every offense merits a penalty ; it is Kant’s signifier of equality. Kant refers to this as jus talionis. which is slackly translates as the right of revenge. However. Kant was opposed to penalizing people if it took away their humanity.In other words. if a individual tortures people. that individual should non be punished by anguish. because making so would be dehumanising OURSELVES. In other words. it would be crouching to the degree of the torturer. Kant did believe in Capital Punishment – in fact. he insisted on it. He states in his book. Metaphysicss on Ethical motive s. that harmonizing to Jus Talionis. liquidators MUST die – there is no earthly penalty other than decease that can equilibrate out a slaying. and therefore continue Jus Talionis. the balance between offense and penalty.It is like a graduated table – the side of justness must equilibrate the side of unfairness. An Exposition of Kant’s. Arendt’s. and Mill’s Moral Philosophy Immanuel Kant adheres to Deontological moralss. His theory offers a position of morality based on the rule of good will and responsibility. Harmonizing to him. people can execute good actions entirely by good purposes without any considerations to effects. In add-on. one must follow the Torahs and the categorical jussive mood in order to move in conformity with and from responsibility.Several other philosophers such as Hannah Arendt discuss Kant’s moral doctrine. In her instance survey: The Accused and Duties of a Law-abiding Citizen . Arendt examines how Adolf Eichmannâ⠂¬â„¢s actions conformed to Kant’s moral principles but besides how they ran of afoul to his construct of responsibility. In contrast. John Stuart Mill adopts a teleological position of moral doctrine. He exposes his position of consequentialism and utilitarianism to reason that an action is morally right merely to the extent that it maximizes the aggregative felicity of all parties involved irrespective of the motivation.In the present paper. I will expose Kant’s moral principles and the importance of responsibility in his Deontological rules. Then. I will measure Arendt’s study on Adolf Eichmann to analyse the ways in which his actions were in conformity to or against Kant’s moral doctrine. I will reason my treatment with an rating of Mill’s attack to morality in order to analyze the differences between his teleological doctrine and Kant’s ethical rules.Kant’s moral doctrine is based on the categorical jussive mood ( CI ) . good wil l. and responsibility. Harmonizing to the CI. it is an absolute necessity. a bid that worlds should harmonize with universalizable axioms to handle people as terminals in themselves and exert their will without any concerns about the effects or conditions of their actions. This construct can besides be expressed in systematic footings by the two following preparations.

Persuasive Essay on Gun Control

Persuasive Essay on Gun Control Persuasive Essay on Gun Control English teachers encourage students to look for controversial issues in society on which to base a persuasive essay. The reason is that the teacher wants a topic that can be easily debated on either side of the issue and that brings forth strong emotions from both sides. The purpose is to help students organize and express ideas in a clear and coherent manner. One such controversial issue is gun control. One side of the argument is that the policies for owning and using guns should be stricter. One who holds such a position might argue as follows: It is very unfortunate that people are losing their loved ones due to the misuse of guns. While guns should be used to enhance security of people in a society, the same guns have been using in perpetuating crimes that have worsened the security status of many countries. In order to eradicate the issue of insecurity, guns should be used only when necessary. In this case there is a need to put in place policies that will ensure that gun use is properly controlled. In addition to this example are suggestions below on how to write a persuasive essay on gun control. Suggestions on How to Write a Persuasive Essay on Gun Control: First, determine what your position is on gun control. Next, plan the major arguments in support of your position. Be sure to offer explanations, facts and statistics, as well as examples. You can even include anecdotal material. Do not forget the â€Å"so what† factor. In other words, make certain to get the reader to see why it is important to that individual’s personal life. Secondly, when preparing a persuasive essay on gun control, the writer should explain the reason why guns are in the hands of the people. Constitutional rights can be discussed as to the original intent and modern interpretation of those rights. In addition, the writer can point out reasons why people should respect the sanctity of life and the right of every human being to be alive, regardless of ones stance on regulations involving gun control. Next, the writer can help the reader to explore whether everyone should have a right to own and operate a gun. For example, should criminals be permitted to own and use a fire arm? What about individuals with mental health issues? While every person is entitled to security, not all people should be issued guns. This is the reason why governments put into place stringent measures for applying for and purchasing weapons. Additionally, the writer can remind the reader that cooperation between civilians and the police is important in following the due process for acquiring guns. Regulations and the need for regulations can be explored in this context. Preparing a persuasive essay on gun control is not as easy as one may think. Emotions run high. On one hand is the need to protect oneself and even ones country. Furthermore, some individuals use weapons for sport, such as range shooting or hunting. However, there are safety issues where someone acts out anger or frustration by pulling a gun and shooting the other person. In addition to that are issues with criminals. Some say that guns should be better monitored to keep them out of the hands of those who would harm society, while others argue that those who break the law will obtain guns anyway. However, regardless of what side of the issue you choose to support, you will need to make your position clear and your arguments strong. Moreover, you will need to convey your ideas in a clear and compelling manner. Feel free to succeed in persuasive essay writing with !